What would it look like if the news simply disappeared?
A 5 p.m. broadcast would not bring updates from City Hall or breaking news across the region. A weekend paper would not spotlight a …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Please log in to continue |
What would it look like if the news simply disappeared?
A 5 p.m. broadcast would not bring updates from City Hall or breaking news across the region. A weekend paper would not spotlight a neighbor, a small business owner or a student's milestone. The sports page would not freeze a championship moment in time.
In a time of strained trust and shrinking resources, that absence is no longer unthinkable. Newsrooms are stretched thin, covering wide regions with small staffs while trying to document daily life as it unfolds.
Without journalism, these stories — the ones that inform, entertain and connect us — risk being lost rather than simply going untold.
Journalism rarely looks like headlines and deadlines. It looks like hours no one sees.
It is late-night school board meetings, quiet county offices and public hearings where decisions are made in real time with long-term consequences. It is documenting votes, budgets, zoning changes, environmental concerns and local milestones that would otherwise pass without record.
The work depends on discipline that does not show up in the final story. It requires separating personal belief from reporting, focusing instead on what can be verified, documented and explained clearly. The goal is not to tell readers what to think but to give them the information they need to decide for themselves.
Journalists bring their own experiences into the work, shaped by the same communities they cover. But the responsibility is to report the facts the same way whether they confirm a belief or challenge it.
Reaction is part of the job. Even routine coverage can draw anger, criticism or hostility. In smaller communities, that response can feel immediate and personal, with little space between reporter and reader.
There are also structural barriers. Access to records is sometimes restricted. Transparency can be uneven. Each obstacle adds friction to work that already depends on persistence.
The role of journalism has long included pushing boundaries to reveal what might otherwise remain hidden.
In 1887, Nellie Bly did exactly that.
"On the 22nd of September I was asked by the World if I could have myself committed to one of the asylums for the insane in New York, with a view to writing a plain and unvarnished narrative of the treatment of the patients therein and the methods of management, etc."
Her assignment, given by Joseph Pulitzer's New York World, led her to spend 10 days undercover in a women's asylum on Blackwell's Island. What she documented exposed systemic abuse and neglect that had largely gone unquestioned behind closed doors.
Born Elizabeth Cochran Seaman, Bly was instructed to avoid sensationalism and report what she observed as she found it, offering praise or criticism where appropriate while maintaining accuracy and fidelity to the truth.
Her reporting included harrowing observations.
"Nearly all night long I listened to a woman cry about the cold and beg to God to let her die. Another one yelled 'Murder!' at frequent intervals and 'Police!' at others until my flesh felt creepy."
Bly also described the treatment of patients, recounting how one woman was handled roughly by the superintendent during a medical episode, leaving her in visible pain and declining health — an experience that led Bly to question whether such conditions worsened the very illnesses the institution claimed to treat.
Bly's work forced change. Public attention followed her reporting, and with it came pressure that led to reforms and increased oversight. Her work helped define investigative journalism as a tool for accountability.
More than a century later, that same spirit appears in different forms.
Closer to home, journalist Ben Raines followed a different kind of trail, one shaped by history, environment and persistence. His work led to the discovery of the wreck of the Clotilda, the last known slave ship to bring enslaved Africans to the United States, connecting present-day communities to a past that had long been discussed but not physically confirmed.
The discovery was not the result of chance. It was built on years of research, interviews and an understanding of shifting landscapes, especially in the complex waterways of the Mobile-Tensaw Delta.
Raines' reporting did not end with identifying the wreck. It extended into telling the stories connected to it, particularly those of Africatown, a community founded by descendants of the Clotilda's survivors. His work helped bring national and international attention to those histories, adding depth and human context to a story that might otherwise have remained confined to archives and oral histories.
In both cases, the work reflects a core principle of journalism: persistence in finding what is buried, lost or hidden, and care in telling it so it is not forgotten.
The work of journalism carries risks that are often unseen.
Some of those risks are sudden and final.
"This is how the nightmare began, the nightmare we would never awaken from. Our daughter, sister and sweetheart left to do an interview for a story — a completely ordinary workday for a freelance journalist. But Kim never came home from work. Instead of writing headlines, she became one." An excerpt from "A Silenced Voice: The Life of Journalist Kim Wall" by Ingrid Wall and Joachim Wall.
Wall was a Swedish freelance journalist known for long-form reporting across countries and subjects. In 2017, she boarded a homemade submarine in Denmark to interview inventor Peter Madsen. She never returned. Her dismembered remains were later recovered at sea. Madsen was convicted of her murder in 2018.
The risks are not limited to distant places or extraordinary circumstances.
On June 28, 2018, a gunman attacked the Capital Gazette newsroom in Annapolis, Maryland, killing five employees.
"Our newsroom, as I'm sure newsrooms throughout the country, was a little on edge on Friday. We ran a story about another mass shooting in our paper. This one was different. It was one that happened inside a newsroom in Maryland.
"A man who reportedly had a grudge against The Capital Gazette in Annapolis shot his way into the newsroom Thursday afternoon, 'looked for his victims,' killed four journalists and a sales assistant and injured two others, according to The Associated Press."
This commentary by GCM's Kayla Green (then Kayla Robins) published the following day on TheItem.com, captured how quickly a newsroom covering tragedy can become the subject of one itself.
Green wrote about her own reporting experiences as well.
"I remember crying the whole hour-long drive home after covering a memorial for a mother and her two sons, ages 8 and 9, who were shot to death by her boyfriend before he also critically injured her father and killed himself," she said.
She recalled an early assignment: seeing a body in the roadway after a fatal crash for the first time.
She also described routine but often tense calls with law enforcement and the public. From upset readers challenging coverage to individuals arriving at the newsroom with grievances, including one man insisting on explaining why homemade explosive devices left at his parents' home had been misunderstood.
"I remember not knowing what to do when another reporter returned to the office shaken from covering a hostage situation that resulted in a father fatally shooting his 11-month-old daughter. I hugged her. She wrote the story."
Still, she pointed to the ordinary humanity inside the profession.
"We're Democrats. We're Republicans. We drink beer. We pray. We eat pizza on election nights and have a collection of red pens."
Those moments of recognition rely on something less visible in the finished story: the conditions that allow journalists to report freely, persistently and without fear. When those conditions change, what reaches the page can change too.
Behind every newsroom story, every investigation and every act of reporting, there is a wider question of whether journalism can operate freely enough for those stories to exist at all.
World Press Freedom Day, observed May 3, is meant to measure what becomes fragile when that shared record is weakened or lost.
The date traces back to the Windhoek Declaration in 1991, when African journalists called for independent, pluralistic media. It was later adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in 1993 through UNESCO.
The intent was not ceremonial. It was structural: to measure whether journalism can operate without interference, intimidation or fear.
That question is not abstract. It shows up in stories already part of the public record — including the 2018 attack on the Capital Gazette newsroom in Maryland — and in the broader pattern of threats and pressure that shape what does and does not get published, or what is withheld when sourcing, verification or accuracy cannot be established.
Each year's theme is meant to reflect the conditions of that moment. In 2026, "Shaping a Future at Peace" points to a media environment increasingly shaped by speed, technology and power, where the ability to verify and sustain accurate information is under strain.
Press freedom, in that context, is not symbolic. It is the system that determines whether the record is complete enough to be trusted.
If journalism disappears, silence is not what follows. Fragmented information already floods social media. That will only get worse.
A photo lacking context is attributed to a different event. A closed business becomes an empty storefront with no record of what it once was.
Where journalism still exists, the pattern reverses.
A high school championship photo preserves a moment that would otherwise live on only with those who were there, as seen in GCM photojournalist Micah Green’s coverage of Gulf Shores High School’s championship win. Records of a restaurant’s opening and closing establish when a place existed and when it did not, as documented by reporter Colin James. Meeting coverage fixes decisions in time rather than memory, as shown in reporting by GCM reporter and Report for America corps member Gabriella Chavez on solar power debates across the county. Sports coverage does the same for competition, as Kam Wicker’s weekly highlights of Baldwin County teams and standout athletes turn short-lived performances into lasting records.
A record is not sentimental. It is functional. It replaces uncertainty with something that can still be verified. Its value is rarely visible in real time. It becomes visible later.
And as Kayla Green wrote in 2018 after the Capital Gazette attack: "We're journalists… We're not going to quit."
